Simple-ViLMedSAM: Simple Text Prompts Meet Vision-Language Models for Medical Image Segmentation
Geng Chen, Daoqiang Zhang, Dong Nie, Chengcan Qian, Xuyun Wen
cvpr
Research metadataShow detailsHide details
- Affiliations
- Not available
- Published
- 2026-06-01
- Processed
- 6/20/2026, 6:32:56 PM
- Analysis model
- Not available
- Analysis status
- not_analyzed
- Local PDF artifact
- papers/pdf/2026/simple-vilmedsam-simple-text-prompts-meet-vision-language-mo.pdf
Abstract
Medical image segmentation is challenging due to limited annotated data, high labeling costs, and substantial image heterogeneity. Although large-scale vision foundation models (e.g., SAM) have shown great potential in this field, existing SAM-based methods typically rely on expert-defined geometric prompts or complex clinical text prompts, which limits their generalizability across diverse medical image segmentation tasks. To overcome these challenges, we propose Simple-ViLMedSAM, a CLIP-SAM integration framework that enables high-accuracy segmentation in zero-shot and few-shot settings using only simple text queries, that is, using only basic anatomical or disease-related text labels. At its core is an Implicit Pos-Prompter (IPP), which generates attribution maps containing implicit positional cues to replace traditional geometric prompts. IPP incorporates a multi-modal information bottleneck and an affinity-based refinement strategy to ensure high-quality guidance from CLIP-SAM interactions. To further enhance segmentation, we introduce a Bidirectional Interaction Decoder (BID) that employs bidirectional cross-attention to align IPP's positional maps with SAM's pixel-level features. By jointly modeling global semantics and local details, BID significantly improves segmentation accuracy. Extensive experiments on four public datasets demonstrate that Simple-ViLMedSAM consistently outperforms existing methods in both zero-shot and few-shot medical image segmentation tasks, using only simple text queries. The code will be publicly available upon acceptance.
Stored markdown is an ingestion scaffold, so it remains excluded until substantive methodology, result, and limitation sections are available.
Analysis unavailable
Only an ingestion scaffold is stored; substantive analysis is not available yet.